Women's Basketball Insights — Campus Crowd Strategies

Research Insights

Booming Sport, Top-Heavy Growth: Where Women's Basketball Attendance Is — and Isn't — Going

Four decades of data show that attendance growth in Division I women's basketball is real and historic — but increasingly, the fans are concentrating at the top. Here is the evidence.

NCAA Division I · Women's Basketball · 1983 to 1984 through 2023 to 2024 · 52 conferences over 40 seasons · By Felecia Theune, PhD

Data notes: The 2020 to 2021 season is absent from the dataset because the NCAA did not report attendance figures for that season due to COVID 19 restrictions. The 2024 to 2025 season is excluded from conference level comparisons due to Pac 12 Conference dissolution and realignment affecting comparability. All findings cover 1983 to 1984 through 2023 to 2024.
Finding 1

The gap between the top conferences and everyone else has never been wider.

By every measure, the distribution of women's basketball attendance across Division I conferences is more unequal today than at any point in the past 40 years. The HHI, a concentration index that measures how evenly attendance is spread across conferences, held stable between 500 and 675 from 1983 to 1984 through 2018 to 2019, then jumped sharply to 717 in 2023 to 2024. The Gini coefficient, a standard measure of inequality, reached 0.509 in 2023 to 2024, up from 0.446 in 2018 to 2019. The top 5 conferences now account for 54.3% of all D I attendance, up from 46.8% in 1999 to 2000. And in 2023 to 2024, not one of the 27 Non Power conferences exceeded the average attendance of a single Power conference program.

HHI concentration index
717
40 year high. Was 607 in 2018 to 2019. Lower = more evenly spread.
Gini coefficient
0.509
Inequality measure. Up from 0.446 in 2018 to 2019.
Top 5 conf. share
54.3%
Up from 46.8% in 1999 to 2000.
Power vs. Non Power ratio
6.4×
Avg. share per conf. Was 3.0× in 1983 to 1984.
HHI, how evenly attendance is spread across D I conferences, 1983 to 1984 through 2023 to 2024

HHI is a standard concentration measure. Lower scores mean attendance is spread broadly. Higher scores mean a few conferences dominate. It held stable for 35 years, then jumped sharply after 2018 to 2019.

Average attendance share per conference, Power vs. Non Power, 1983 to 1984 through 2023 to 2024
Power conferences, ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, SEC, Pac 12 Non Power conferences

Each line shows the average share of total D I attendance held by a single conference in each group. Power conferences hold 5 to 6× more per conference than Non Power, and that ratio has grown from 3.0× in 1983 to 1984 to 6.4× in 2023 to 2024.

Finding 2

The data confirms it: the Power conference advantage is real, consistent, and getting bigger every year.

Statistical analysis of 1,242 conference season observations, covering every D I conference from 1983 to 1984 through 2023 to 2024, confirms that the top heavy pattern is not random variation. It is a systematic, measurable, and slowly widening feature of Division I women's basketball. Three findings stand out.

What the analysis shows — in plain language
  • 1 Power conferences hold about 7 percentage points more of total D I attendance than Non Power conferences every year, regardless of overall growth, COVID, or any other factor. This is the single largest driver in the model. It holds across every season in the dataset.
  • 2 That gap has widened by roughly 2 percentage points over the past 40 years, slowly, but consistently, one year at a time. The model estimates the Power conference advantage grows by about 0.05 percentage points per year. Across four decades, that adds up to a meaningful and measurable structural shift.
  • 3 COVID did not cause this trend. The analysis shows the gap was already growing before 2020 and continues growing independently of the pandemic. COVID made the gap more visible by temporarily collapsing Non Power attendance more severely, but the underlying trend predates it.
What this means for your program: Power conferences are not just bigger. They are capturing a larger share of every new fan the sport gains, year after year. For Non Power programs, building attendance means deliberately outpacing a structural headwind that has been building since 1983 to 1984. Understanding that headwind is the first step toward developing strategies that work against it.

OLS regression · R²=0.648 · N=1,242 conference season observations · 1983 to 1984 through 2023 to 2024

Finding 3

COVID hit Non Power conferences twice as hard and widened the gap it was already creating.

The pandemic did not affect all conferences equally. From 2018 to 2019 to 2021 to 2022, Power conference attendance declined 12.9%. Non Power conference attendance declined 26.9%, more than double. The conferences least able to absorb the disruption lost the most ground. Both groups have recovered strongly since 2021 to 2022, but Non Power conferences started their recovery from a deeper hole, and the concentration numbers reflect it.

Power conf. COVID decline
−12.9%
2018 to 2019 to 2021 to 2022
Non Power conf. decline
−26.9%
2018 to 2019 to 2021 to 2022, 2× worse
Power recovery
+53.6%
from 2021 to 2022 baseline
Non Power recovery
+45.3%
from 2021 to 2022 baseline
Power vs. Non Power total attendance, 1983 to 1984 through 2023 to 2024
Power conferences Non Power conferences

The asymmetric COVID collapse is visible. The Non Power layer drops more steeply in 2021 to 2022 and recovers more slowly. 2020 to 2021 is absent from the dataset because the NCAA did not report attendance that season.

Growth rates by era, Power vs. Non Power conferences
Power conferences Non Power conferences
1983 to 1984 to 1999 to 2000
Early expansion
Title IX implementation drives rapid program growth across all levels
2000 to 2001 to 2009 to 2010
Growth decade
Most balanced era. Non Power conferences keep pace with Power growth.
2010 to 2011 to 2018 to 2019
Pre COVID plateau
Overall growth slows. Non Power attendance flatlines while Power continues climbing.
2019 to 2020 to 2021 to 2022
COVID disruption
Pandemic restrictions hit Non Power programs more than twice as hard as Power conferences.
2021 to 2022 to 2023 to 2024
Broadcast and NIL surge
TV expansion, NIL adoption, and the Caitlin Clark effect drive record attendance concentrated at the top.

Growth rates are measured from total attendance at start and end of each era. COVID period bars are shown in red. The early expansion era remains the dominant visual, a reminder of how far the sport has come.

Context

The growth is historic and that makes the top heavy story more important, not less.

Total Division I women's basketball attendance grew from 1.1 million in 1983 to 1984 to more than 10 million in 2023 to 2024, an 835% increase. Average attendance per game rose from 525 to 1,912. This is genuine, remarkable growth that reflects an expanding fanbase and growing cultural significance. But growth alone does not tell the full story. When the sport was growing fastest, Non Power conferences were growing alongside Power conferences. In the most recent era, Power conferences are capturing a disproportionate share of every new fan gained. The question for the sport is not whether women's basketball is growing. It is who that growth is reaching.

1983 to 1984 total attendance
1.1M
28 conferences
2023 to 2024 total attendance
10.1M
32 conferences
40 year growth
+835%
1983 to 1984 to 2023 to 2024
2023 to 2024 avg. per game
1,912
up from 525 in 1983 to 1984
Total D I women's basketball attendance, 1983 to 1984 through 2023 to 2024

2020 to 2021 is absent from the dataset because the NCAA did not report attendance that season. The gap in the line reflects that missing season. The 2023 to 2024 total of 10.1M is the highest on record.

Let's talk about what this means for your program.

Campus Crowd Strategies helps athletic departments use data to grow attendance, strengthen fan engagement, and build sustainable crowd strategies.